|
Integrated Wildlife Management Plan: Na'cho N'y'ak Dun Traditional
Territory
Action Agenda 1997-2000: Traplines
Enforcement
Current Status:
With passage of the Umbrella Final Agreement on February 14, 1995, enforcement
of trapline regulations became considerably more complicated by granting
enforcement authority to First Nations on Settlement Lands and by-law
recommendation authority to RRCs. Trapline allocation authority was also
split between YTG and the First Nation and involves the RRCs in monitoring
and advisory roles.
| Concern:
Everyone involved with trapline regulations and enforcement
is confused by the new UFA regime.
Solution:
Provide a simple explanation of how traplines are regulated
under the UFA. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Send Recommendation
RRC-8 on trapline regulations to YDRR/YFWMB |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Check progress on Recommendation
RRC-8 |
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
MDRRC |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Concern:
By-laws recommended by the MDRRC cannot be enforced by YTG
and NND.
Solution:
Ensure that by-laws passed by the MDRRC can be enforced on
Crown and Settlement Lands. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Send Recommendation
RRC-9 on amending Wildlife Act to YDRR |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Check progress on Recommendation
RRC-9 |
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
MDRRC |
| Ensure that NND legislation provides
for the enforcement of trapline by-laws on Settlement Land |
1997/1998
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
NND |
| |
|
|
|
Lands & Policies
Current Status:
The potential for wilderness tourism in NNDTT is high but little is offered
at present. One apparent option is for trappers to use their trapline
facilities for tourism. With respect to policies concerning the purchase
of traplines, matters regarding the inclusion of assets in the evaluation
have confounded NND initiatives to purchase traplines in accordance with
sections 16.11.5 and 16.11.6 of the Umbrella Final Agreement.
| Concern:
Trappers are not sure about laws regarding wilderness tourism
on traplines.
Solution:
Facilitate wilderness tourism on traplines. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Send Recommendation
RRC-10 on trapline tourism to YDRR/DIAND |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Check progress on Recommendation
RRC-10 |
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
MDRRC |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Concern:
Trapline assessments are
too high for purchase by NND.
Solution:
Resolve trapline assessment
policies. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Send Recommendation
RRC-11 on trapline evaluations to YDRR |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Check progress on Recommendation
RRC-11 |
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
MDRRC |
| |
|
|
|
Group Areas
Current Status:
There are no group trapping areas in NNDTT except for a 5 mile radius
around the community of Mayo. Group trapping areas can only be held by
a First Nation - not an RRC. A group area can be created at any time by
NND as long as it informs the territorial government.
| Concern:
Some traplines are not utilized and people want to trap but
have no opportunity.
Solution:
Make it possible for more people to get involved in trapping. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Look into establishing group areas
in NNDTT |
1997/1998
1998/1999 |
NND |
| |
|
|
|
Unused Lines
Current Status:
Under section 16.11.10, the MDRRC is instructed to regularly review the
use of traplines and make recommendations to the Minister and First Nations
on the assignment and reassignment of all new, vacant and under-utilized
traplines.
| Concern:
Some traplines are unused but are not being transferred to
active trappers.
Solution:
Encourage active use of more traplines in NNDTT. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Recommend active trappers for concessions
|
1997/1998
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
MDRRC |
| Make a system for keeping track of
trapline activity |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Monitor trapping activity and recommend
reallocations where appropriate |
1997/1998
1998/1999 |
MDRRC |
| Straighten out policies on disposal
of traplines where concession holder is deceased |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC, YTG |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Concern:
It is economically difficult to trap on remote lines.
Solution:
Provide incentive programs for trapping. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Look into ways of establishing incentive
programs |
1997/1998 |
NND |
| Request report on feasibility study
for a harvest support program per Section 16.15.1 of the UFA
|
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Encourage establishment of a harvest
support program |
1997/1998 |
NND |
| |
|
|
|
Opportunities
Current Status:
There are many attractions of the trapping lifestyle which is seen to
be practiced by a few experienced people in the community. Those with
little or no experience in this occupation may feel that it is impossible
to break into or is too big a risk without any experience or support.
| Concern:
It is difficult for
potential trappers to learn about trapping and experience
the lifestyle.
Solution:
Encourage others to get involved with trapping and experience
the lifestyle. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Keep list of people interested in
being trappers assistants and trappers who are willing to take
assistants |
1997/1998 |
YTG, NND |
| |
|
|
|
Compensation
Current Status:
In cases where a trapline is withdrawn by YTG for reasons other than
mismanagement by the trapper, compensation is paid to the trapper based
on the average net profit from the trapline over the preceding three years.
Recommendation to not renew a trapline is made by YTG to the Concession
and Compensation Review Board where the trapper can make representation.
Since 1988 the Board has upheld 22 recommendations by YTG and overturned
8. There is no compensation for loss of lifestyle or improvements to the
line etc. Also, no compensation is paid if the line is destroyed by wildfire.
Where a trapline is affected by a development such as mining, in order
to be granted a water licence, the proponent must demonstrate that compensation
has been negotiated with the trapper or else the Water board will determine
the compensation to be paid. Where developments do not involve the Water
Board or YTG and compensation is not agreed to, the trapper must take
the case to the Federal Court.
| Concern:
The MDRRC feels that compensation by YTG does not reflect
the true value of the trapline.
Solution:
Review YTG policy on compensating a trapper for loss of line
or negative impacts. |
| Actions: |
When: |
Who: |
| Send Recommendation
RRC-12 on trapline compensation to YTG |
1997/1998 |
MDRRC |
| Check progress on Recommendation
RRC-12 |
1998/1999
1999/2000 |
MDRRC |
| |
|
|
|
|